Logged-in pricing snapshots · August 17–18, 2026

Arcads pricing starts at $77/month during the current 30% promotion.

The captured monthly view shows Starter at $77, Creator at $154, and Pro at $385. A separate yearly view shows higher per-month figures during a different promotion, so compare the live checkout rather than assuming annual billing is cheaper.

Price warning: the monthly capture shows 30% off; the yearly capture shows 20% off. Promotions and account offers can change, and the yearly screenshot does not expose the full annual charge or payment schedule. Confirm the final total and renewal terms at checkout.
$77Starter promotional monthly price shown
$1.54price per maximum listed clip on Starter
800credits per Talking Actor minute, per actor
No rolloveron Starter and Creator according to Arcads help
Should you buy Arcads today?

Only buy when actor-led ad variation is the bottleneck you are ready to test.

A paid test is reasonable when

  • You already have a product, offer, landing page, and ad script.
  • You need multiple actor reads faster than sourcing human creators.
  • You can judge the output against a real campaign acceptance checklist.
  • You are comfortable treating the first month as a controlled production test.

Do not start here when

  • You need a free trial before entering payment details.
  • You expect the first generation to be automatically publishable.
  • You have not read the credit, rollover, cancellation, and refund terms.
  • Your main need is product URL import, localization, or broad business video.
Best first action

If the positive case fits, use Starter and run one brief before upgrading. If it does not fit, compare Creatify for ecommerce ads or HeyGen for broader avatar video before clicking an Arcads checkout CTA.

Quick purchase answers

What most buyers need to know before opening checkout.

Does Arcads have a free trial?

The logged-in monthly paywall we captured did not show a permanent free plan. Treat Arcads as a paid evaluation unless the current checkout presents a different trial or account-specific offer.

Which Arcads plan should a first-time buyer choose?

Starter is the rational first plan for one controlled actor-led ad test. Creator and Pro only make sense after real output volume or specific workflow features justify the higher monthly cost.

Can you get an Arcads refund after generating?

Normally not for creative dissatisfaction. The published policy ties a billing-period cash refund to a request within 30 days and zero credits used; confirmed failures may receive credit reimbursement instead.

Creator walkthrough evidence

Four checkpoints determine whether Arcads is worth paying for.

Attributed walkthrough stills let us inspect the parts of the workflow that affect a buying decision: audience fit, delivery control, product visibility, and the moment credits are committed. They document the interface shown in a creator account; they are not presented as our own paid benchmark or proof of final output quality.

Arcads actor library open with gender, age, actor type, and filming situation filters

The library can be narrowed before generation. The visible filters cover gender, age, actor type, and filming situation, making the first shortlist more deliberate than scrolling through faces.

Creator walkthrough still
Step 01 / Shortlist before generating

Actor fit is the first variable you are paying to test.

The practical advantage is not the headline library size. It is the ability to hold the offer and script constant while changing the presenter, demographic, and filming context.

  • Filter for the intended buyer before choosing a face.
  • Shortlist several plausible actors instead of one favorite.
  • Judge the batch by usable rate, not by its best-looking frame.
Watch ZoCo Marketing select actors at 02:01
What these screens do not prove

They do not establish lip-sync quality, hand accuracy, product fidelity, a typical usable-output rate, or campaign return. Those questions still require a small same-script test with rejected generations counted.

Creator-reported paid campaign

One agency used the same script across seven actor variants.

Christian Sonic shows an ad-account workflow and reports the following outcome from his own agency campaign. These are self-reported results from one offer and are not an Arcads benchmark, typical result, or independently audited case study.

7same-script video variants
~$1Kreported campaign spend
14reported booked calls
$82reported cost per call
What the case usefully suggests

Arcads can make actor variation cheap enough to test. The actionable method is to preserve the offer and script while changing one visible variable.

What the case does not prove

The video does not provide an audited attribution window, equal spend per creative, lead quality, revenue, or a controlled non-Arcads baseline. One variant receiving 11 calls may also reflect delivery allocation.

Generation time is variable: one walkthrough reports roughly 2-5 minutes for several preset jobs; the other reports roughly 10-15 minutes for its Talking Actor batch. Treat speed as model-, length-, and queue-dependent rather than a promised turnaround.
Monthly and yearly paywall evidence

Both billing views matter because the captured promotions conflict.

These screenshots were captured inside the same Arcads subscription interface. Use the switch to inspect the plan names, visible limits, locked features, and promotion attached to each billing view.

Arcads monthly pricing paywall showing Starter at 77 dollars, Creator at 154 dollars, and Pro at 385 dollars

Monthly view captured August 17, 2026. Starter, Creator, and Pro show a 30% promotion: $77, $154, and $385 per month.

Primary capture
PlanMonthly viewYearly viewDifference shown
Starter$77/mo$88/moMonthly capture is $11 lower
Creator$154/mo$176/moMonthly capture is $22 lower
Pro$385/mo$440/moMonthly capture is $55 lower
Do not infer a permanent billing advantage: these are two dated promotional snapshots. Check the live checkout for the billing period, amount charged today, renewal price, taxes, and cancellation date before paying.
Plan breakdown

What each Arcads plan buys.

Starter
$77 / month
Monthly capture · $110 before discountYearly view shows $88/month
  • 8,000 credits
  • Up to 600 seconds of AI Avatar talking
  • Up to 50 AI video clips
  • 300 Natural AI Actors
  • All models, Mark agent, and MCP access
  • 200 free NanoBanana images/month

Best fit: one marketer validating whether Arcads output works for a real campaign.

Pro
$385 / month
Monthly capture · $550 before discountYearly view shows $440/month
  • 48,000 credits
  • Up to 3,600 talking seconds
  • Up to 300 video clips
  • 1,500 Natural AI Actors
  • API, unlimited team seats, ElevenLabs
  • Custom actors, rollover, Slack and calls

Best fit: an agency or production operation that needs collaboration, automation, actor cloning, and predictable monthly volume.

First-principles recommendation

Do not buy Creator because it is marked “Most Popular.” Buy it only when your expected workload exceeds Starter and the additional workflow tools save more than the extra $77 per month. Pro is a capability purchase, not merely a volume discount.

Unit economics

The headline cost per clip is only the best-case floor.

$1.54Starter: $77 divided by the listed maximum of 50 video clips
$1.54Creator: $154 divided by the listed maximum of 100 clips
$1.28Pro: $385 divided by the listed maximum of 300 clips

Those numbers assume you use the full clip allowance and every clip is valuable. Real cost rises when a generation is rejected, a model consumes more credits, captions or translation use additional credits, or the output requires another editor.

For Talking Actor generation, Arcads' official help center lists 800 credits per minute, per actor, with duration rounded up. That means a short single-actor clip can consume the full one-minute unit. A two-actor video multiplies the charge by two. Arcads' own example says a 1 minute 45 second video with two actors rounds to two minutes and consumes 3,200 credits.

The credit traps to understand

Not every generation costs the same.

Arcads credit costs and buyer implications by generation action
ActionOfficial credit signalBuyer implication
Talking Actor800 credits per minute, per actor; rounded upShort and multi-actor scripts can be less credit-efficient than expected.
Video modelsRanges from 24–304 for Grok to 320–1,200 for Sora 2 Pro; Seedance 1080p can reach 1,620The same monthly credit balance produces very different output counts by model.
Product showcase preset800 creditsOne preset can equal a Talking Actor minute.
Add captions80 creditsFinishing operations also consume the pool.
Translate video240 creditsLocalization volume needs a separate allowance.
Hook repurposer800 creditsCreative variation is not free even when the original video already exists.
Rollover rule: Arcads says Starter and Creator credits reset each cycle and do not roll over. Pro, Scale, and Business credits accumulate only while the subscription remains active. Pro overages can be billed per extra credit.
Usable-output calculator

Calculate the number that matters.

Enter the plan price, how many drafts you expect to generate, and the share you would genuinely publish or test.

Usable rate

This excludes human editing, media spend, staff time, and unused credits. Use it to compare workflows, not to predict ROAS.

Public experience signals

Arcads appears capable, but the buyer experience is inconsistent.

Where sources broadly agree

Hands-on blogsThe best actors can produce convincing short-form output, while weaker actors and longer or emotional scripts reveal a synthetic feel.Repeated theme
Workflow reviewsArcads is strongest as a script-to-actor generation layer. Strategy, final polish, launch, and campaign optimization remain outside the core job.Repeated theme
User reviewsPrice, quality variance, support delays, and refund expectations recur in negative feedback; positive reviews praise time savings and strong results when prompts and actors fit.Mixed signal
Our conclusionArcads is better for testing multiple hooks than for guaranteeing one perfect brand video.Reasoned inference
Positive experience
“quality of production, with the right prompts”
Dominic Savage · 5/5Trustpilot · July 16, 2026 · unprompted review
Read and verify on Trustpilot
Quality caution
“The video generated look blurry and low quality”
Gabriel Naulleau · 1/5Trustpilot · June 21, 2026 · unprompted review
Read and verify on Trustpilot

Why these excerpts: they isolate the same buying variable from opposite experiences, namely output quality. They are not presented as representative of every Arcads customer.

Refund and cancellation risk

Read this before using the first credit.

A cash refund may apply when

  • The billing-period charge is within 30 days and zero credits were used.
  • A first charge was accidental, requested within 24 hours, with zero credits used.
  • Arcads charged you after a documented cancellation.

A refund normally does not apply when

  • A completed output works technically but you dislike the creative result.
  • Any credits were already used in the current billing period.
  • A credit reimbursement request arrives more than 30 days after the failed generation.

Confirmed platform failures may qualify for credit reimbursement rather than cash. Save generation IDs, screenshots, error messages, and support correspondence when a job fails.

First paid session protocol

Make the first credit spend answer a buying question.

Arcads first paid session checklist before, during, and after generation
Before generatingDuring generationAfter export
Pick one offer, one audience, one CTA, and one vertical format.Capture the credit estimate or model setting before each generation.Mark each output as launchable, editable, or rejected.
Shortlist three actors that plausibly match the product category.Do not change script and actor at the same time unless you record why.Calculate software cost per launchable ad, not per generated clip.
Write the rejection criteria before seeing the outputs.Save failures, glitches, and support messages as evidence.Upgrade only if the usable rate justifies Creator or Pro capacity.
Brand-safety checkpoint

Do not let an AI actor invent customer experience.

Creator tutorials often demonstrate first-person testimonial scripts. That format can be persuasive, but it can also become deceptive when a synthetic presenter implies personal product use or repeats unsupported health and performance claims.

  • Use competitor ads for structure research, not copied scripts or claims.
  • Do not make a synthetic actor claim they personally used the product.
  • Keep evidence for health, earnings, and performance statements.
  • Disclose dramatization or AI generation where law or platform policy requires it.
  • Verify names, numbers, pronunciation, captions, and the final CTA before launch.
  • Keep documented customer consent when adapting a real testimonial.
Our buying call

Start with Starter only after preparing one controlled test. Use a final script, shortlist actors first, and record every rejected generation. Upgrade only when the workflow produces enough launchable ads to justify the higher monthly commitment.

Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission from the Arcads link at no added cost to you.

Source ledger

What this pricing guide is based on.

Primary captureArcads monthly paywall screenshotCaptured Aug 17, 2026
Primary captureArcads yearly paywall screenshotCaptured Aug 18, 2026
Official platform guideEverything You Can Do on ArcadsFeatures and workflow scope
Official onboardingGetting Started with ArcadsProduct image and Talking Actor flow
Official creditsHow Arcads counts creditsPublished Apr 29, 2026
Official billing helpLimits, rollover, upgrades and overagesRechecked Aug 18, 2026
Official policyArcads refund policyPublished May 22, 2026
Creator walkthroughZoCo Marketing: Arcads AI Tutorial 2026Interface, workflow and limitations
Creator caseChristian Sonic: AI UGC Ads That Actually ConvertSelf-reported campaign; not audited
Neutral review platformArcads reviews on Trustpilot165-review snapshot
Independent publisherThe Stack Insiders Arcads reviewClaims attributed, not treated as our test